⚖️ Law · Criminal Law

Memory tricks for criminal law

Elements of crime, mens rea, homicide, theft, defenses, inchoate crimes, and felony murder rule.

⚖️ Criminal Law

Memory Tricks

Proven Mnemonics & Acronyms — fast to learn, hard to forget.

Elements of Crime
MA + AC (M=Mens Rea/guilty mind, A=Actus Reus/guilty act, A=Attendant Circumstances, C=Causation) — elements of every crime
Mens Rea · Actus Reus + Attendant Circumstances · Causation
Mens Rea · Actus Reus + Attendant Circumstances · Causation
Every crime requires a guilty mind (mens rea) plus a guilty act (actus reus). MA + AC: Mens Rea (criminal intent) · Actus Reus (voluntary act or omission) · Attendant Circumstances (required facts) · Causation (for result crimes). The prosecution must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt.
Mens rea
Guilty mind — the mental state required. MPC levels: purposely, knowingly, recklessly, negligently. Common law: specific vs. general intent.
Actus reus
Voluntary act or culpable omission. Reflex actions, sleepwalking, and acts under duress are NOT voluntary — no actus reus.
Attendant circumstances
Required facts that must exist — e.g., for statutory rape, the victim must be under the age of consent.
Mens Rea Levels
PKRN (P=Purpose, K=Knowledge, R=Recklessness, N=Negligence) — MPC mental states from highest to lowest culpability
Purposely · Knowingly · Recklessly · Negligently
Purposely · Knowingly · Recklessly · Negligently
The Model Penal Code ranks criminal intent from most to least culpable. PKRN — think of it as descending: Purposely (your conscious goal) → Knowingly (aware it will happen) → Recklessly (conscious disregard of risk) → Negligently (should have known the risk). Higher mens rea = harsher punishment.
Purposely
Conscious object to engage in the conduct or cause the result. The most culpable level — "I meant to do it."
Knowingly
Aware that the conduct is of that nature or that the result is practically certain to follow. "I knew it would happen."
Recklessly
Consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk. "I knew there was a serious risk and ignored it."
Homicide
Homicide: 1=First-degree murder (premeditated), 2=Second-degree murder (intent without premeditation), VM=Voluntary Manslaughter (heat of passion), MK=involuntary ManKilling/Manslaughter (negligence or recklessness)
Murder 1st · Murder 2nd · Voluntary manslaughter · Involuntary manslaughter · Misdemeanor-manslaughter
Murder 1st · Murder 2nd · Voluntary manslaughter · Involuntary manslaughter · Misdemeanor-manslaughter
Homicide is the killing of one human by another — not all are criminal, and criminal homicides vary widely in severity. 1st degree murder requires premeditation + deliberation. 2nd degree is intentional but unplanned. Voluntary manslaughter is heat of passion. Involuntary is reckless or negligent killing.
Murder 1st degree
Premeditated + deliberate killing. "I planned it." Also includes felony murder during specified dangerous felonies (BARRK (B=Burglary, A=Arson, R=Robbery, R=Rape, K=Kidnapping) — predicate felonies for the felony murder rule: Burglary, Arson, Rape, Robbery, Kidnapping).
Murder 2nd degree
Intentional killing without premeditation, or killing with extreme recklessness (depraved heart). Unplanned but intentional.
Voluntary manslaughter
Heat of passion killing — adequate provocation, no cooling-off period, causal link between provocation and killing.
Theft Crimes
LEFT·B·R (L=Larceny, E=Embezzlement, F=False pretenses, T=Theft by trick, B=Burglary, R=Robbery) — theft crimes
Larceny · Embezzlement · False pretenses · Theft by trick · Burglary · Robbery
Larceny · Embezzlement · False pretenses · Theft by trick · Burglary · Robbery
Theft crimes look similar but have critical distinctions examiners love to test. LEFT·B·R: Larceny (trespassory taking) · Embezzlement (lawful possession then convert) · False pretenses (title through fraud) · Theft by trick (possession through fraud) · Burglary (breaking and entering) · Robbery (larceny + force or fear).
Larceny
Trespassory taking and carrying away of another's personal property with intent to permanently deprive. The baseline theft offense.
Embezzlement
Fraudulent conversion of property by someone who lawfully possessed it — e.g., an employee stealing from the register.
False pretenses
Obtaining title to property through a false representation of a material past or present fact. Victim passes title voluntarily.
Criminal Defenses
SIDED (S=Self-defense, I=Insanity, D=Duress, E=Entrapment, D=Defense of others) — criminal defenses
Self-defense · Insanity · Duress · Entrapment · Diminished capacity
Self-defense · Insanity · Duress · Entrapment · Diminished capacity
SIDED covers the defenses most tested in criminal law. Some are complete defenses (acquittal) while others only reduce the charge or sentence. Self-defense and duress are justifications — the act was right. Insanity and diminished capacity are excuses — the act was wrong but defendant lacked culpability.
Self-defense
Reasonable belief of imminent unlawful force. Must use proportionate force. Initial aggressors generally cannot claim self-defense.
Insanity
M'Naghten: didn't know nature of act OR didn't know it was wrong. MPC: lacked substantial capacity to appreciate criminality or conform conduct.
Duress
Imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm compelling the crime. NOT a defense to murder in most jurisdictions.
Inchoate Crimes
ACS (A=Attempt, C=Conspiracy, S=Solicitation) — the three inchoate crimes
Attempt · Conspiracy · Solicitation
Attempt · Conspiracy · Solicitation
Inchoate crimes punish steps toward a crime even if the target offense never occurs. ACS: Attempt (substantial step toward commission) · Conspiracy (agreement between two+ to commit a crime) · Solicitation (asking another to commit a crime). All three require mens rea — you must intend the target offense.
Attempt
Specific intent + a substantial step beyond mere preparation. MPC: substantial step strongly corroborative of criminal purpose. Abandonment is a defense under MPC only.
Conspiracy
Agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime + an overt act (MPC/most states). Pinkerton rule: co-conspirators liable for foreseeable crimes of each other.
Solicitation
Asking, encouraging, or inducing another to commit a crime with intent they do so. Complete at the moment of asking — no acceptance needed.
4th & 5th Amendment
MIRANDA (Must Inform Rights iN Any Detained Arrest) = Must inform suspects of: right to silence, anything said can be used against them, right to attorney, appointed attorney if cannot afford
Must · Inform · Rights · Before · Any · Questioning
Must · Inform · Rights · Before · Any · Questioning
Miranda warnings are required before custodial interrogation. MIRANDA: police Must Inform you of your Rights Before Any Questioning while in custody. The four warnings: right to remain silent · anything said can be used against you · right to an attorney · if you can't afford one, one will be appointed.
Custody
Person is deprived of freedom in a significant way — under arrest or equivalent restraint. Traffic stops alone are NOT custody.
Interrogation
Express questioning OR words/actions police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.
Waiver
Rights can be waived if waiver is knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Silence alone is NOT a waiver — must be affirmative.
Accomplice Liability
PAPA (P=Principal, A=Aiding and abetting, P=Participation before crime, A=Accessory After the fact) — accomplice liability
Principal · Aider · Principal in 2nd degree · Accessory after the fact
Principal · Aider · Principal in 2nd degree · Accessory after the fact
Criminal liability extends beyond the person who pulls the trigger. PAPA: Principal (commits the act) · Aider and abettor (assists with intent) · Principal in 2nd degree (present, aids at the scene) · Accessory after the fact (helps after crime is complete — lesser offense). Modern law largely collapses these into principal and accomplice.
Accomplice liability
Aider/abettor is liable as a principal — same crime, same punishment. Must have intent to assist AND intent the crime be committed.
Mere presence
Simply being at the scene is NOT enough for accomplice liability. Must actively aid, abet, counsel, or encourage.
Accessory after the fact
Knowingly helps a felon escape arrest, trial, or punishment after the crime. Separate, lesser offense — not liable for the underlying crime.
Felony Murder
BARRK
Burglary · Arson · Rape · Robbery · Kidnapping
Burglary · Arson · Rape · Robbery · Kidnapping
The felony murder rule holds all participants liable for murder if anyone dies during the commission of a dangerous felony — even accidentally. BARRK covers the five felonies that most commonly trigger the rule. If a getaway driver's accomplice kills someone inside the bank, the driver is guilty of murder too.
The rule
No separate mens rea needed for the killing — the intent to commit the underlying felony substitutes. Strict liability for the death.
Scope
Applies to all co-felons present. Death of a co-felon by a victim or police typically does NOT trigger felony murder (agency theory).
Merger limitation
Underlying felony must be independent of the killing — assault cannot merge into felony murder or every assault killing becomes 1st degree murder.
🎓 Common Exam Questions
Q: What does MA + AC stand for and explain the elements of a crime?
A: MA + AC (Mens Rea + Actus Reus + Attendant Circumstances): the building blocks of every crime. Actus Reus (guilty act): the voluntary physical act (or omission where there is a legal duty) that constitutes the criminal conduct. Involuntary acts (reflex, seizure, sleepwalking, hypnosis) are NOT actus reus. Omissions create liability only where a legal duty exists: statute (required by law to act), contract (lifeguard), relationship (parent to child), voluntary undertaking (began rescue and abandoned it), or created the peril. Mens Rea (guilty mind): the mental state required for the crime (see PKRN). Strict liability crimes require NO mens rea — typically regulatory offenses (traffic violations, statutory rape in some states, selling alcohol to minors). Attendant Circumstances: additional facts that must exist for the crime to be committed (e.g., for receiving stolen property: must know goods are stolen). Causation: defendant's act must be the actual cause (but-for) AND proximate cause (foreseeable, not broken by a superseding intervening cause) of the result.
Q: What does PKRN stand for and explain the MPC mental state hierarchy?
A: PKRN (Purpose, Knowledge, Recklessness, Negligence): the four mental states from the Model Penal Code (MPC), from highest to lowest culpability. Purpose (intentionally in common law): the defendant's conscious object is to cause the result or engage in the conduct — the most culpable state. Knowledge: the defendant is aware that their conduct is practically certain to cause the result — not hoping or desiring, but aware it will happen. Recklessness: the defendant consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk — the defendant is AWARE of the risk and ignores it. This is the minimum for common law murder (implied malice). Negligence: the defendant SHOULD HAVE BEEN aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk but was not — the objective standard. Below what a reasonable person would have done. Criminal negligence requires a gross deviation from the standard. Key MPC rule: if a statute doesn't specify the mental state required, recklessness is the minimum. If a statute uses purpose, knowledge, or recklessness as to any element, it applies to all material elements unless otherwise specified.
Q: What does MIRANDA stand for and explain the 5th and 4th Amendment rights in criminal procedure?
A: MIRANDA (Must Inform Rights Before Any Questioning Done Anywhere): before custodial interrogation, police must inform suspects: (1) You have the right to remain silent. (2) Anything you say can and will be used against you in court. (3) You have the right to an attorney. (4) If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you. Miranda warnings required when: in custody (not free to leave — objective reasonable person test) AND being interrogated (express questioning or its functional equivalent). Waiver must be knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Invoking right to silence: police must stop questioning. Invoking right to counsel: police must stop and cannot resume without counsel present. 4th Amendment: protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Warrant required with probable cause and particularity, OR exception applies: search incident to lawful arrest, automobile exception, plain view, consent, exigent circumstances, Terry stop (reasonable suspicion). Exclusionary rule: evidence obtained in violation of 4th or 5th Amendment is excluded from trial.
Q: What are the homicide levels (1·2·VM·MK) and what distinguishes each?
A: 1·2·VM·MK (First-degree murder, Second-degree murder, Voluntary manslaughter, Murder/involuntary manslaughter — MK/Manslaughter Killing): First-degree murder: premeditated and deliberate killing (specific intent to kill, planned in advance) or felony murder during BARRK felonies. Some states include other highly aggravated murders. Second-degree murder: intent to kill without premeditation (heat of passion without adequate cooling time), intent to cause serious bodily harm resulting in death, or depraved heart (extreme recklessness showing callous disregard for human life — pointing a loaded gun into a crowd). Voluntary manslaughter: intentional killing with adequate provocation (heat of passion with inadequate cooling time — reasonable person test). Classic provocation: catching a spouse in the act of adultery. Involuntary manslaughter: unintentional killing from criminal negligence or recklessness (misdemeanor manslaughter rule in many states). Key distinctions: premeditation separates first from second degree; heat of passion reduces to voluntary manslaughter; recklessness/negligence is involuntary manslaughter.
Q: What is the BARRK felony murder rule and what are its limits?
A: BARRK (Burglary, Arson, Robbery, Rape, Kidnapping): the predicate felonies triggering the felony murder rule — if any death occurs during the commission of or flight from one of these inherently dangerous felonies, all co-felons are guilty of murder, regardless of intent. Rationale: the law treats the intent to commit the dangerous felony as a substitute for the intent to kill. Extensions: deaths during flight count (continues until felon reaches a place of temporary safety). Deaths by police or victims: agency theory (majority) — only liable if one of the felons caused the death; proximate cause theory (minority) — liable for any foreseeable death resulting from the felony. Limits: the predicate felony must be independent of the killing (merger doctrine — assault resulting in death cannot be predicate for its own felony murder because the assault merges with the homicide). Res gestae: the killing must be in furtherance of the felony and causally connected to it. Many states have reformed felony murder to require that the defendant be present or that the death be foreseeable.