🏥 Infectious Disease · HIV
HIV/AIDS CD4 thresholds: <500 (HIV symptoms) · <200 (PCP prophylaxis, AIDS) · <100 (Toxo, Crypto) · <50 (MAC, CMV retinitis)
CD4 count predicts which opportunistic infection is most likely
<500
CD4 below 500 — early symptomatic disease
As CD4 counts fall below 500, patients begin to develop oral candidiasis, hairy leukoplakia (caused by EBV), and recurrent bacterial infections.
<200
CD4 below 200 — the AIDS-defining threshold
Below 200, PCP (Pneumocystis pneumonia) becomes a real risk, and this threshold triggers starting TMP-SMX prophylaxis — which conveniently also provides Toxoplasma prophylaxis at the same time.
<100
CD4 below 100
Below 100, Toxoplasmosis and Cryptococcal meningitis become significant risks.
<50
CD4 below 50 — the most severe immunosuppression
Below 50, MAC (Mycobacterium avium complex) becomes a risk, triggering azithromycin prophylaxis, and CMV retinitis (presenting with floaters and decreased vision) becomes a concern as well.
A patient with AIDS and a CD4 count of 45 develops new floaters and decreased vision — this points to CMV retinitis, an opportunistic infection specifically associated with this severe level of immunosuppression, requiring urgent ophthalmologic evaluation.
1
A patient with AIDS has a CD4 count that has fallen to 45 and reports new floaters along with decreased vision in one eye.
2
Ask: what does this combination of CD4 level and symptoms point to? CMV retinitis — an opportunistic infection specifically associated with CD4 counts below 50, and floaters plus decreased vision are its classic presenting symptoms.
3
Contrast: if this same patient's CD4 count were instead around 150 (rather than 45), and they developed progressive dyspnea rather than visual symptoms, PCP would be the much more likely concern instead — reflecting the different threshold (<200) at which that particular infection becomes relevant.
4
This threshold-based approach — using the specific CD4 number to narrow down which opportunistic infection is most likely — is exactly how exams expect you to reason through an HIV-related infection vignette, rather than just recognizing 'immunocompromised' as a vague risk category.

Exams test matching each CD4 threshold to its associated opportunistic infections (<500: candidiasis, hairy leukoplakia; <200: PCP, prophylaxis started; <100: Toxoplasmosis, Cryptococcal meningitis; <50: MAC, CMV retinitis) and specifically that TMP-SMX prophylaxis started at CD4 <200 covers both PCP and Toxoplasma simultaneously.

The most common trap is forgetting that TMP-SMX prophylaxis, started at the CD4 <200 threshold for PCP, also covers Toxoplasma prophylaxis at the same time — a two-for-one detail that's frequently tested and easy to overlook if you think of PCP and Toxoplasma prophylaxis as two separate decisions.

1. What opportunistic conditions appear as CD4 falls below 500?
Oral candidiasis, hairy leukoplakia (EBV), and recurrent bacterial infections.
Tap to reveal / hide
2. What infection risk begins at CD4 below 200, and what prophylaxis is started?
PCP (Pneumocystis pneumonia); TMP-SMX prophylaxis is started, which also covers Toxoplasma prophylaxis.
Tap to reveal / hide
3. What two infections become significant risks at CD4 below 100?
Toxoplasmosis and Cryptococcal meningitis.
Tap to reveal / hide
4. What two conditions become risks at CD4 below 50, and what prophylaxis is started for one of them?
MAC (Mycobacterium avium complex, triggering azithromycin prophylaxis) and CMV retinitis.
Tap to reveal / hide
5. What are the classic presenting symptoms of CMV retinitis?
Floaters and decreased vision.
Tap to reveal / hide